United Airlines tried to persuade a federal judge that a “window seat” describes where a seat is located, not whether a passenger can actually look through a window. The judge was not persuaded.
United argued that the term “window seat” merely identifies a seat next to the side of the aircraft, rather than promising an actual window or an outside view.
I first wrote about this lawsuit last year, which alleges that United sold certain seats on Boeing 737s, Boeing 757s, and Airbus A321s as window seats even though no window was positioned beside them.
A great solo travel tip spotted this week on Live and Let's Fly.
